Page 42 - VIA Broschüre
P. 42

MATTHIAS





                                 WENZEL








                                 While being a PhD student at the doctoral   experience that has remained unrepeated.
             DISSERTATION TOPIC  program on Dynamic Capabilities and Rela-  Looking back, this sandbox has greatly con-
           Market-shaping Capabilities:   tionships, I could feel that DCR is a special   tributed to my professional development
           Examining a Sub-capacity of   place for the professional development of   as an academic. DCR’s provision of essen-
                Dynamic Capabilities
                                 academics. Sure, the program had overt   tial means has laid a solid methodological,
                 PERIOD OF STAY  characteristics that differed from other   theo retical, and network-generating foun-
                  04/2012 – 01/2015   career paths in academia. For example, unlike   dation for conceptual and empirical inquiries
                  02/2015 – 03/2015    doctoral candidates who work at a professo-  into relevant contemporary managerial
            as Postdoctoral Researcher
                                 rial chair, we did not have any teaching or   phenomena. The program’s openness for
              CURRENT POSITION   administrative obligations; and unlike exter-  counterintuitive research outcomes has
             Professor of Organization   nal doctoral candidates who are employed in   spurred the curiosity necessary to explore
                 Studies at Leuphana    businesses or administrations, we received   the unexplored, to see the unseen, and to
               University of Lüneburg
                                 a scholarship that more or less covered our   make the invisible visible. And the provision
                                 living expenses. In addition, we were struc-  of a secure, duty-free environment created
                                 tured in cohorts and received theoretical and   the independence necessary to dare to
                                 metho dological input in the first year of our   articulate what otherwise remains unsaid,
                                 PhD as well as access to networks in research   and to unhide what otherwise was to
                                 and practice throughout the entire program,   remain hidden.
                                 which was (and still is) rather unusual.
                                                                     In post­truth societies, scientific insights
                                 Although these characteristics of DCR were   are increasingly marginalized, such that
                                 visible, and although I could feel that these   public debates are increasingly dominated
                                 characteristics were special, I came to   by noncurated, ungrounded ideas and “fake
                                 understand much later what is so special   news” that polarize the business world and
                                 about them. In principle, they are constitu-  society at large. To counter these trends,
                                 tive features of a “research sandbox”. That   participating in public debates based on
                                 is, DCR (1) provided us with all essential   substantiated, thoughtful knowledge is ever
                                 means — know ledge and skills, financial   more important. Intended or not, DCR has
                                 resources, and a network — (2) to experiment   provided me with the confidence to “speak
                                 with research ideas (3) in a secure and   up” based on such knowledge. Therefore,
                                 duty-free environment. Indeed, working in   I am very thankful for being part of the
                                 such a sandbox was special — a unique   DCR “research sandbox”.
          40
   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47